Mental Model
August 29, 2025
5
Min
Using Inversion: The Thinking Tool That Solves Complex Problems
Inversion Thinking
|
This is the quiet power of inversion.
It’s a thinking tool we reach for time and again in our work with senior leaders, especially when the path forward feels cluttered with options, risks, or ambiguity. The best part? It’s deceptively simple to learn, but remarkably profound in effect.
Let’s unpack how inversion works - and why you should be using it more.
In complex environments, the natural urge is to fixate on outcomes: “How do we increase market share?” “What must we do to build a high-performance culture?” These are good questions—but they can also trap us in default patterns, half-solutions, or consensus-driven noise.
Inversion flips the script.
Rather than ask, “What do we want?”, we ask, “What should we avoid?” Or more precisely: “What would guarantee failure?”
This matters because our brains are wired to spot problems more reliably than to conjure breakthroughs. Nobel laureate Daniel Kahneman highlights this in Thinking, Fast and Slow, noting that losses loom larger than gains in our mental models. Inversion doesn’t exploit that bias - it partners with it.
Inversion isn’t just a clever mind trick. It’s a cognitive reframe with serious leadership applications. It helps us:
And critically, it pushes us past groupthink by surfacing unspoken assumptions.
We often teach leaders a four-part model to put inversion into action—especially useful for strategy offsites, pre-mortems, and leadership development programmes.
Instead of asking, “What would success look like?”, ask:
“What would a total failure look like?”
Map it out vividly: missed deadlines, disengaged teams, lost customers. Don’t soften it.
Enterprise Example:
At a global logistics company, instead of defining what an ideal digital transformation looked like, the COO asked, “What would make this effort a textbook disaster?” Answers included: “Over-customising tech,” “not involving warehouse leads,” and “no clear owner for data migration.”
This inversion immediately clarified key focus areas—before any solutioning began.
Reflection Prompt: What would a guaranteed failure of your current priority initiative look like in painful, specific terms?
Micro-action: Schedule a 30-minute “Failure First” brainstorm with your core team.
Take your list of failure scenarios—and turn them into inverted principles.
“If neglecting the frontline team causes failure, then…”
“Engage frontline input early and often” becomes a strategic must-have.
This isn’t just the inverse of bad outcomes. It’s a commitment to avoid causal pathways to failure.
Think of this like building a fence around the cliff, not just placing an ambulance at the bottom.
Reflection Prompt: What patterns from past failures can be codified into “never again” principles?
Micro-action: Turn your top 3 inverted insights into behavioural norms or strategic checkpoints.
Conventional pre-mortems ask, “It’s six months later and we’ve failed—why?”
Inversion adds a sharper edge:
“If we wanted this to fail, what exactly would we do?”
It’s shocking how liberating this exercise can be. It gives people permission to surface tensions, gaps, or habits that are usually downplayed.
Enterprise Example:
A regional banking leadership team used this method before launching a new SME lending product. One executive said, “If we wanted this to flop, we’d make onboarding forms as complex as possible.” That insight alone led to a complete rethink of customer intake design.
Micro-action: Run a reverse pre-mortem with your cross-functional team. Make it a standing practice before every major initiative.
Most teams create plans full of actions—but rarely declare the things they will explicitly not do. That’s a miss.
The power of inversion is that it produces an operational “Not-To-Do List.”
Examples:
Writing these down turns tacit intent into active guardrails.
Micro-action: Add a “Not-To-Do” slide to your next leadership deck. Make it as visible as your KPIs.
Here’s how to embed inversion into your leadership toolkit:
Pro Tip: Don’t run this solo. Inversion thrives on cross-pollination. Involve voices across seniority levels to spot blind spots early.
Inversion seems simple—but it’s easy to misuse. Here are four mistakes we often see:
What would the failure version of your current strategy look like, three headlines down the line?
What is one repeated failure pattern in your leadership team’s history—and how could you invert it into a behavioural rule?
When leaders commit to this form of thinking, we’ve seen tangible gains:
And most important of all: leaders report sharper judgement. Not just more ideas—better discernment.
Run a reverse pre-mortem before your next major proposal or pitch. Just one hour.
Ask: If we wanted this to fail, what would we do?
Then ask: How do we make sure we don’t?
That’s inversion at its best.
Team SHIFT
What if we told you that you could improve your strategic clarity not by focusing on what to do - but by thinking about what not to do?
This is the quiet power of inversion.
It’s a thinking tool we reach for time and again in our work with senior leaders, especially when the path forward feels cluttered with options, risks, or ambiguity. The best part? It’s deceptively simple to learn, but remarkably profound in effect.
Let’s unpack how inversion works - and why you should be using it more.
In complex environments, the natural urge is to fixate on outcomes: “How do we increase market share?” “What must we do to build a high-performance culture?” These are good questions—but they can also trap us in default patterns, half-solutions, or consensus-driven noise.
Inversion flips the script.
Rather than ask, “What do we want?”, we ask, “What should we avoid?” Or more precisely: “What would guarantee failure?”
This matters because our brains are wired to spot problems more reliably than to conjure breakthroughs. Nobel laureate Daniel Kahneman highlights this in Thinking, Fast and Slow, noting that losses loom larger than gains in our mental models. Inversion doesn’t exploit that bias - it partners with it.
Inversion isn’t just a clever mind trick. It’s a cognitive reframe with serious leadership applications. It helps us:
And critically, it pushes us past groupthink by surfacing unspoken assumptions.
We often teach leaders a four-part model to put inversion into action—especially useful for strategy offsites, pre-mortems, and leadership development programmes.
Instead of asking, “What would success look like?”, ask:
“What would a total failure look like?”
Map it out vividly: missed deadlines, disengaged teams, lost customers. Don’t soften it.
Enterprise Example:
At a global logistics company, instead of defining what an ideal digital transformation looked like, the COO asked, “What would make this effort a textbook disaster?” Answers included: “Over-customising tech,” “not involving warehouse leads,” and “no clear owner for data migration.”
This inversion immediately clarified key focus areas—before any solutioning began.
Reflection Prompt: What would a guaranteed failure of your current priority initiative look like in painful, specific terms?
Micro-action: Schedule a 30-minute “Failure First” brainstorm with your core team.
Take your list of failure scenarios—and turn them into inverted principles.
“If neglecting the frontline team causes failure, then…”
“Engage frontline input early and often” becomes a strategic must-have.
This isn’t just the inverse of bad outcomes. It’s a commitment to avoid causal pathways to failure.
Think of this like building a fence around the cliff, not just placing an ambulance at the bottom.
Reflection Prompt: What patterns from past failures can be codified into “never again” principles?
Micro-action: Turn your top 3 inverted insights into behavioural norms or strategic checkpoints.
Conventional pre-mortems ask, “It’s six months later and we’ve failed—why?”
Inversion adds a sharper edge:
“If we wanted this to fail, what exactly would we do?”
It’s shocking how liberating this exercise can be. It gives people permission to surface tensions, gaps, or habits that are usually downplayed.
Enterprise Example:
A regional banking leadership team used this method before launching a new SME lending product. One executive said, “If we wanted this to flop, we’d make onboarding forms as complex as possible.” That insight alone led to a complete rethink of customer intake design.
Micro-action: Run a reverse pre-mortem with your cross-functional team. Make it a standing practice before every major initiative.
Most teams create plans full of actions—but rarely declare the things they will explicitly not do. That’s a miss.
The power of inversion is that it produces an operational “Not-To-Do List.”
Examples:
Writing these down turns tacit intent into active guardrails.
Micro-action: Add a “Not-To-Do” slide to your next leadership deck. Make it as visible as your KPIs.
Here’s how to embed inversion into your leadership toolkit:
Pro Tip: Don’t run this solo. Inversion thrives on cross-pollination. Involve voices across seniority levels to spot blind spots early.
Inversion seems simple—but it’s easy to misuse. Here are four mistakes we often see:
What would the failure version of your current strategy look like, three headlines down the line?
What is one repeated failure pattern in your leadership team’s history—and how could you invert it into a behavioural rule?
When leaders commit to this form of thinking, we’ve seen tangible gains:
And most important of all: leaders report sharper judgement. Not just more ideas—better discernment.
Run a reverse pre-mortem before your next major proposal or pitch. Just one hour.
Ask: If we wanted this to fail, what would we do?
Then ask: How do we make sure we don’t?
That’s inversion at its best.
Team SHIFT
What if we told you that you could improve your strategic clarity not by focusing on what to do - but by thinking about what not to do?
This is the quiet power of inversion.
It’s a thinking tool we reach for time and again in our work with senior leaders, especially when the path forward feels cluttered with options, risks, or ambiguity. The best part? It’s deceptively simple to learn, but remarkably profound in effect.
Let’s unpack how inversion works - and why you should be using it more.
In complex environments, the natural urge is to fixate on outcomes: “How do we increase market share?” “What must we do to build a high-performance culture?” These are good questions—but they can also trap us in default patterns, half-solutions, or consensus-driven noise.
Inversion flips the script.
Rather than ask, “What do we want?”, we ask, “What should we avoid?” Or more precisely: “What would guarantee failure?”
This matters because our brains are wired to spot problems more reliably than to conjure breakthroughs. Nobel laureate Daniel Kahneman highlights this in Thinking, Fast and Slow, noting that losses loom larger than gains in our mental models. Inversion doesn’t exploit that bias - it partners with it.
Inversion isn’t just a clever mind trick. It’s a cognitive reframe with serious leadership applications. It helps us:
And critically, it pushes us past groupthink by surfacing unspoken assumptions.
We often teach leaders a four-part model to put inversion into action—especially useful for strategy offsites, pre-mortems, and leadership development programmes.
Instead of asking, “What would success look like?”, ask:
“What would a total failure look like?”
Map it out vividly: missed deadlines, disengaged teams, lost customers. Don’t soften it.
Enterprise Example:
At a global logistics company, instead of defining what an ideal digital transformation looked like, the COO asked, “What would make this effort a textbook disaster?” Answers included: “Over-customising tech,” “not involving warehouse leads,” and “no clear owner for data migration.”
This inversion immediately clarified key focus areas—before any solutioning began.
Reflection Prompt: What would a guaranteed failure of your current priority initiative look like in painful, specific terms?
Micro-action: Schedule a 30-minute “Failure First” brainstorm with your core team.
Take your list of failure scenarios—and turn them into inverted principles.
“If neglecting the frontline team causes failure, then…”
“Engage frontline input early and often” becomes a strategic must-have.
This isn’t just the inverse of bad outcomes. It’s a commitment to avoid causal pathways to failure.
Think of this like building a fence around the cliff, not just placing an ambulance at the bottom.
Reflection Prompt: What patterns from past failures can be codified into “never again” principles?
Micro-action: Turn your top 3 inverted insights into behavioural norms or strategic checkpoints.
Conventional pre-mortems ask, “It’s six months later and we’ve failed—why?”
Inversion adds a sharper edge:
“If we wanted this to fail, what exactly would we do?”
It’s shocking how liberating this exercise can be. It gives people permission to surface tensions, gaps, or habits that are usually downplayed.
Enterprise Example:
A regional banking leadership team used this method before launching a new SME lending product. One executive said, “If we wanted this to flop, we’d make onboarding forms as complex as possible.” That insight alone led to a complete rethink of customer intake design.
Micro-action: Run a reverse pre-mortem with your cross-functional team. Make it a standing practice before every major initiative.
Most teams create plans full of actions—but rarely declare the things they will explicitly not do. That’s a miss.
The power of inversion is that it produces an operational “Not-To-Do List.”
Examples:
Writing these down turns tacit intent into active guardrails.
Micro-action: Add a “Not-To-Do” slide to your next leadership deck. Make it as visible as your KPIs.
Here’s how to embed inversion into your leadership toolkit:
Pro Tip: Don’t run this solo. Inversion thrives on cross-pollination. Involve voices across seniority levels to spot blind spots early.
Inversion seems simple—but it’s easy to misuse. Here are four mistakes we often see:
What would the failure version of your current strategy look like, three headlines down the line?
What is one repeated failure pattern in your leadership team’s history—and how could you invert it into a behavioural rule?
When leaders commit to this form of thinking, we’ve seen tangible gains:
And most important of all: leaders report sharper judgement. Not just more ideas—better discernment.
Run a reverse pre-mortem before your next major proposal or pitch. Just one hour.
Ask: If we wanted this to fail, what would we do?
Then ask: How do we make sure we don’t?
That’s inversion at its best.
Team SHIFT