At a recent offsite, a seasoned COO shared the story of a promising product her previous start-up had developed. It had great traction early on, attracted glowing press, and even landed a few big clients. But eighteen months later, they quietly shut it down. “The unit economics were terrible. But we kept pointing to Dropbox and Slack and saying, ‘It’ll turn.’ We thought we were the exception.”

Everyone around the table nodded. They’d all seen versions of this before - ideas that looked like winners until they weren’t. The cautionary tales that never make the stage at TED or the top of your LinkedIn feed.

Yet these "non-survivors" are precisely where some of the most strategic learning hides.

‍

The Invisible Teacher in the Room

We live in a world that glorifies winners. Case studies highlight unicorns. Panels feature success stories. And leadership books often mine only the upper-right quadrant of the outcomes map.

But when we rely too heavily on visible success, we risk falling prey to survivorship bias - the cognitive distortion of focusing on those who "made it" while ignoring the lessons buried in failure.

Why does this matter?

Because ignoring failure skews our understanding of risk, inflates confidence in flawed models, and creates blind spots in strategic decision-making. In fact, a CB Insights report found that 35% of start-ups fail due to no market need, a lesson that rarely surfaces when we only look at those who pivoted just in time.

‍

‍

The Red Flags We Miss When We Only Study Winners

To counter survivorship bias, we need a structured way to extract insight from failures. At Team SHIFT, we use a model called The 4Rs of Missed Success. These represent common patterns that derail promising ventures - and can easily trip up seasoned leaders in larger organisations, too.

‍

1. Rushed Validation

Many failed start-ups built something elegant before deeply testing the problem. They skipped customer ethnography. They relied on early adopters’ praise rather than probing broader demand.

Corporate corollary: Scaling a new initiative without pressure-testing the core assumptions across departments, markets, and decision-makers.

Prompt for reflection: Where are we mistaking enthusiasm for evidence?

Try this: Schedule a “pre-mortem” session before greenlighting a new product or strategic shift. Ask, “How could this fail within 12 months?”

‍

2. Repurposed Metrics

Start-ups under pressure often default to the wrong KPIs. They focus on app downloads instead of retention, or revenue growth without understanding CAC/LTV dynamics.

Corporate corollary: Declaring success based on vanity metrics that don't align with long-term viability.

Prompt for reflection: Are we measuring what’s easy or what actually matters?

Try this: Conduct a quarterly “metrics audit” with your leadership team. Revisit which indicators are tied to strategic outcomes versus surface-level wins.

‍

3. Recycled Mental Models

Many start-up founders chase models that worked for others - freemium because Spotify did it, blitzscaling because Uber did. They borrow instead of building from first principles.

Corporate corollary: Adopting playbooks that worked in different markets or eras without adjusting for context.

Prompt for reflection: What assumptions are we importing that may not hold in our current environment?

Try this: For each major decision, identify which parts are legacy thinking and which are freshly reasoned. Label them during strategy meetings.

‍

4. Reluctant Course-Correction

Momentum is seductive. Founders fall in love with their original thesis. They fear losing face with investors. They delay pivots until runway runs out.

Corporate corollary: Sticking with failing strategies due to sunk-cost fallacy or internal politics.

Prompt for reflection: What would we do differently if this weren’t already “in motion”?

Try this: Create a no-blame “course-correction clause” in project charters. Make regular pivot discussions part of the governance structure.

‍

How to Build Failure-Aware Strategy

Here’s how we help leadership teams operationalise this mindset:

1. Institutionalise learning from near-misses.
   Include project post-mortems and “almost failed” retrospectives in quarterly reviews.
   
   
2. Benchmark against closed cases, not just winners.
   Study competitors that didn’t make it. Identify which patterns resonate uncomfortably.
   
   
3. Foster psychological safety around red flags.
   Teams are more likely to spot early warning signs when failure isn’t taboo.
   
   

Pro Tip: Invite a “contrarian observer” to key project reviews - someone tasked with playing devil’s advocate based on historical failures.

‍

Common Missteps We’ve Witnessed

Over the years, we’ve seen leaders fall into a few sophisticated traps:

Hero Worship: Modelling too closely after celebrity CEOs without factoring in timing, luck, or ecosystem differences.

Survivor Templates: Over-relying on best practices from companies that succeeded in radically different conditions.

Data Erasure: Not capturing data from failed pilots because “we moved on.”

Cosmetic Pivots: Rebranding a failed effort instead of dissecting what didn’t work.

Our remedy: Treat every failure like a product launch - document it, debrief it, and share the story internally.

‍

Executive Reflection Corner

Prompt 1: What’s a recent initiative that didn’t meet expectations - and what didn’t we learn from it?
Prompt 2: What’s one lesson from a failed venture (ours or others’) that we haven’t yet applied where it counts?

‍

The Quiet Benefits of a Failure-Informed Culture

Leaders who adopt this lens don’t just avoid pitfalls - they gain:

• More grounded innovation pipelines
  
  
• Greater team trust through honest post-mortems
  
  
• Sharper risk calibration in new markets
  
  
• Resilience when the first draft of strategy doesn’t land
  
  

Over time, this builds a culture that celebrates learning as much as it celebrates growth.

‍

Your Next Strategic Move

This week, carve out 45 minutes to study a failed initiative - internal or external. Not to assign blame, but to extract wisdom. Invite two people who weren’t directly involved and ask:

What would have needed to be true for this to succeed?

What early signals might we have missed?

Then share your findings. Quiet lessons, spoken aloud, often shift the loudest strategies.

Team SHIFT

‍