You’re in the middle of a high-stakes boardroom discussion. A promising acquisition offer is on the table. On paper, it checks all the boxes. But something in your gut says, “Not this one.” Do you pause to question that instinct? Or do you trust it and walk away?

This tension - between rapid, instinctive judgement and rigorous mental framing - shows up everywhere in leadership. Strategic hires, product pivots, international expansion decisions. It’s tempting to think we must choose one path: cold logic or inner knowing. But that binary thinking limits us.

The real question isn’t which to use, but when.

Intuition and Models: Allies or Opposites?

Let’s be clear. Neither intuition nor mental models are inherently superior. Both are adaptive tools honed through experience, just with different rules of engagement.

Daniel Kahneman, Nobel laureate and behavioural psychologist, famously drew the distinction:

“Intuition is nothing more and nothing less than recognition.”

It’s fast, experience-based, subconscious pattern matching. But patterns can mislead. Mental models, by contrast, offer deliberate scaffolding for reasoning. They slow us down, help us interrogate assumptions, and bring clarity where instincts might blur.

A McKinsey study on decision-making in volatile environments found that leaders who balanced intuitive insight with structured thinking saw 12% higher returns on initiatives than those who leaned heavily in one direction.

So how do we know when to switch gears?

‍

The Calibration Compass: A 4-Part Model

To help leaders decide when to rely on gut feel versus structured thinking, we use what we call The Calibration Compass. It maps four key factors:

1. Familiarity of Context

Intuition thrives in domains you’ve mastered. A seasoned sales leader can often “just tell” when a rep is faking pipeline numbers. That instinct isn’t magic - it’s pattern fluency born from hundreds of reps.

But enter a new market or evaluate a novel technology? Your gut is operating blind. That’s the moment for models.

Reflection prompt:

Where in your current role are you relying on experience in unfamiliar contexts?

Micro-action:
Map your current strategic priorities. Label each as “known terrain” or “new territory.” Use this to pre-flag which decisions warrant deeper analysis.

2. Cost of Being Wrong

Every leader makes bad calls. The question is, which ones can you afford?
When the downside is minimal, a quick gut-based choice may be efficient. But when careers, reputation, or millions are at stake, pausing for deliberate modelling is not optional.

Consider the airline pilot’s mantra: “When in doubt, always aviate, navigate, communicate - in that order.” They trust muscle memory for flying the plane, but bring in checklists and communication when complexity rises.

Micro-action:
For every major decision this quarter, rate the impact of a poor outcome on a 1–10 scale. For anything above a 7, insist on using a structured model to guide discussion.

3. Speed of Decision Needed

Crisis moments - PR firestorms, cyberattacks, supply chain disruption - often demand instinctive action. In such cases, waiting to assemble a decision framework can be dangerous.

But beware the seductive rush of urgency. Not every “urgent” email justifies an intuitive leap. Leaders must distinguish true velocity from imposed pressure.

Pro Tip:
If a decision feels urgent but isn't irreversible, create a 30-minute pause rule. Use that window to ask: “What model or heuristic could make this decision more robust?”

4. Team Trust and Transparency

Intuition is hard to share. You can’t point to your gut on a slide. Mental models, however, are visible. They promote alignment, offer audit trails, and help your team understand how you’re thinking, not just what you decided.

If you’re coaching a developing leadership team, favour models. They create teachable moments. But if you're in a high-trust environment with peers who share your domain fluency, a well-articulated instinct may carry the day.

Micro-action:
In your next team decision, ask each person to write down: “What is my gut telling me?” and then: “What framework could help us stress-test this?” Share both.

Putting the Compass to Work

Now that you’ve met the Calibration Compass, how do you make it part of your decision rhythm?

1. Pre-wire key discussions with Compass inputs.
   Add the four factors (Familiarity, Cost, Speed, Transparency) to your meeting prep templates. Let the context shape the mode of thinking.
2. Run dual-track thinking sessions.
   Use intuition as a starting hypothesis, then test it with a model like Second-Order Thinking or Inversion. Or do the reverse - use a model to frame, then gut-check the outcome.
3. Archive decisions with rationale type.
   Track whether past decisions were primarily intuitive or model-driven. Review success rates quarterly. Patterns will emerge about where each style thrives.

Pro Tip:
Use voice notes or short Loom videos to record intuitive rationale in the moment. This helps you debrief later - and builds muscle in articulating instinct.

‍

Where Seasoned Leaders Get It Wrong

Even experienced leaders fall into predictable traps. Here are four we see often:

• Mistaking familiarity for expertise.
  Just because a situation feels like something you’ve seen doesn’t mean it is. Especially dangerous in cross-cultural or cross-functional decisions.
• Over-intellectualising when urgency calls.
  Trying to model your way through a crisis can paralyse action. Not all data can be gathered in time. Learn to “decide and course-correct” when needed.
• Using intuition to justify bias.
  “I just didn’t like them” isn’t strategic hiring. Run your instincts through structured scorecards, even when you're sure you're right.
• Forgetting to teach the ‘why’.
  If you're always leading from intuition, your team can’t learn from your decisions. Share the meta-thinking.

Executive Reflection Bench

Prompt 1: In which types of decisions do I tend to over-rely on my gut - and what has that cost me?
Prompt 2: What’s one recent decision I could replay through a model to learn from the contrast?

Set aside 15 minutes this week to journal answers. Better yet, bring them into your next exec team discussion.

What You Gain by Thinking in Stereo

When you learn to move fluidly between mental models and intuition, you unlock a kind of decision “stereo” - both the depth of analysis and the speed of instinct. This dual-track thinking improves:

• Strategic foresight under pressure
• Confidence in ambiguous conditions
• Team-wide learning from individual choices

And most crucially, it helps you course-correct without losing momentum. Great leadership isn’t about always being right - it’s about knowing how you were wrong and adjusting fast.

One Non-Negotiable for This Week

Pick one upcoming strategic decision. Run it explicitly through the Calibration Compass. Then ask yourself: “What does my gut say?” and “What would my best model say?”

Let the dialogue between the two guide you.

If you’ve got a story about this tension - a time your intuition saved the day or nearly sunk the ship - we’d love to hear it.

In partnership,
Team SHIFT

‍